When an LMS Isn’t the Right Tool for the Job
- Samantha
- Aug 14, 2025
- 3 min read
Picture this: a mid-sized company is rolling out a brand-new learning management system (LMS). They have high hopes - finally, a central hub for all their training materials, a place for employees to learn at their own pace, they’ll definitely see a bump in productivity.
Fast forward six months: hardly anyone is logging in, managers are frustrated by the admin load, and employees are describing the system as “clunky” and “confusing.” The LMS has become a very expensive, underused digital filing cabinet.
The problem wasn’t that the LMS platform was bad. The problem was that this team didn’t actually need one.
The Big Picture: Why LMSs Aren’t a Universal Solution
Learning management systems are powerful. They offer a huge range of features: course hosting, progress tracking, assessments, gamification - you name it. For large organizations with dedicated learning and development (L&D) teams, they can be game-changing.
But for smaller teams, specialized companies, or organizations without a formal L&D function, an LMS can introduce more problems than it solves. Here’s why:
1. Hidden Costs, Resource Demands, and Digital Literacy
An LMS isn’t a “set it and forget it” tool.
First, staff need training just to use the system - not only learners, but also the people creating and managing the content. Some platforms even require backend coding skills to fully control the learning experience (source).
Then there’s the ongoing administration: uploading content, updating outdated modules, troubleshooting access issues (source). That takes time, resources, and people.
If your team is small or already stretched thin, those hidden costs can quickly outweigh the benefits.
2. The Project Management Problem
Rolling out an LMS is a project in itself, and not a small one.
You need people with specific skill sets to onboard, integrate, and maintain it. Ideally, you also have an L&D specialist to design training programs that actually engage learners and achieve your business goals (source).
But in reality, many teams hand this work to someone already juggling multiple projects. Without the bandwidth or expertise, the LMS ends up half-implemented, frustrating everyone involved.
3. Poor UX = Poor Engagement
Even the best LMS won’t help if nobody wants to use it.
Some platforms are unintuitive, cluttered, or just plain boring. Self-led learning can be overwhelming for many employees, especially if the content library is massive but irrelevant to their day-to-day work.
Overly complex interface designs often lead to “click fatigue” - where learners give up before they even find what they need. The result? Low engagement, low completion rates, and minimal impact (source).
4. Misaligned Use Cases
Many LMS platforms were originally designed for universities or large corporations, not smaller, agile teams with dynamic learning needs (source).
If your workforce is dispersed, includes freelancers or contractors, or relies heavily on external partners, you may also run into access issues.
And if your training goals are highly targeted, you might find the LMS’s “all-in-one” approach bloated and unnecessarily complex.
So, What’s the Alternative?
Before committing to an LMS, ask yourself:
What exactly do we need from a learning tool?
Do we have the people and skills to manage it long-term?
Will our team actually use it - and enjoy using it?
There are plenty of other options out there: microlearning apps, knowledge-sharing tools, and even simple project management software with training features. You may also consider lightweight learning platforms, such as AirTrain, that focus on verifying understanding of important, everyday communications rather than building full training courses.
An LMS can be a powerful asset - but only if it’s the right fit. If it’s not, it’s just another shiny tool gathering digital dust.
If you’re curious about how AirTrain can help level up your team’s learning and communication processes, book a call today:
Comments